Showing posts with label health insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health insurance. Show all posts

Thursday, February 1, 2018

My take on the Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase foray into health insurance

Okay, so a lot of people are freaking out about this thinking that the 3 power house combo is going to actually do something significant in the marketspace. Health insurer stocks tumbled, investors are jittery.

It's all BS.

How many times have I used this term in my posts?

None.

Why am I saying this?

Because what people think will save money won’t. I can take their group TODAY, and change their medical spend TODAY, freeing up massive amounts of cashflow TODAY. Guaranteed or I don’t get paid (I only get paid after I demonstrate results).

The best that they can do is the create something similar to what Kaiser has done in California. It’s a great system, but nothing new. Here are several reasons why.

1.       There is a floor to how much you can pay doctors. Any less and they will work for someone else.
2.       There is a floor to how much you pay hospital staff. Any less and they will work for someone else.
3.       My personal opinion is that 30% of ALL studies that modern medicine is based upon are either fake (artificially generated results) or not able to be replicated. More of bad medicine means sicker people, not healthier.
4.       They will buy into the three darlings of large brokerages:
a.       Population Health Management
b.       Wellness
c.        Analytics
These WILL NOT dramatically impact the severity and frequency of claims THIS YEAR. They will save a little money, but no more than “dust on a peanut” for a large employer.
5.       They will listen to “experts” who will tell them that cost increases due to “trend” are inevitable and PAY them money when their rates go up by millions of dollars (and think it’s okay).

Technology will NOT solve these problems.
Technology will NOT dramatically reduce the severity and frequency of claims.
My best guess is that they will NOT allow alternative medicine into the mix (acupuncture, naturopathy, etc). If they do, good for them. But it will still NOT reduce the severity and frequency of claims.


Have I made myself clear enough?

Friday, May 5, 2017

New Health Insurance Bill (HR 1628) Has Issues

Everyone has heard that the House passed some form of a health care repeal bill (HR 1628). Here is more stuff surrounding this bill to consider.
1. The Senate has already said that if they pass a bill, it will be different than the House version. Some have even hinted that they'd start with a fresh page and then build up a bill from there.
2. It will be difficult to have all 52 Republicans agree to vote in the Senate for any bill. If they lose just 2 votes, the bill is DOA.
3. Insurers have until June 21st to say whether they will be in or out of the exchanges. With so much up in the air, don't be surprised if there are several areas of the country that won't have any insurers participating (areas in TN and IA are the most at risk at this point in time). But if there is just one carrier, they can set whatever rates they choose. Welcome back to monopolies. Note that one part of a Senate bill may be to allow subsidies from carriers outside of the exchange, but that doesn't mean that insurance companies would want to take those subsidies.
4. The bill that passed harms medicaid recipients most, those with pre-existing conditions second. Having friends with special needs children agonize over this has been painful. My cousin, Fran Cannon Slayton spoke about her fears in a New York Times article this week as being a cancer survivor. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/02/health/obamacare-patients-preexisting-conditions.html?hpw&rref=health&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well&_r=0
5. What needs to be fixed is the underlying problem. The COST of healthcare is too much. The QUALITY of healthcare is questionable (my estimate is that 40% of the studies that doctors rely on to indicate what care to give are either falsified, cannot be replicated, or do not actually apply to the population they are applying them to). If you read all of the problems with studies and what the academic world is doing to fix this, you'll see what I mean. My family has been the recipient of BAD healthcare as recently as 6 weeks ago (luckily we got a second opinion). It is out there, it is prevalent, it needs to be fixed.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Individual Health Insurance Rates Skyrocket for Health Exchange Market (healthcare.gov) for Illinois

I just got back from a professional association meeting where a person from the department of insurance was presenting. What he presented is grim at best (slides are from that presentation). Below is a preliminary cut. I don't have the actual rates available to quote (they are coming any day), but by the look of the items below, it will be worse than bad. See my analysis at the end.

1. Selection of insurance companies available is less. Seven counties have one company available.






















2. Rates for the LOWEST Bronze Level plan are going up 10% - 60%.


3. Rates for the second lowest silver plan (for which subsidies are based upon) are going up 25% - 60%


4. Rates for the lowest Gold are going up 40% - 70% with several counties not offering any gold plans at all.


What does this mean?

1. If you receive a subsidy, you will be protected for a majority of the increase due to your subsidy being dramatically increased. You may still pay more money.

2. Your choices are dramatically curtailed. Your best option will most likely be an HMO plan. Most carriers are driving towards that eventuality as it is the only way that they feel they can break even. Pretty much BCBS of Illinois (in my opinion) will be the only game in town as a quality carrier with decent rates. Cigna is joining the market in a few areas, but I don't have specifics.

3. If you need multiple specialists from multiple medical groups or the teaching hospitals (e.g. Northwestern Memorial, or a Northshore Hospital). You may not be able to access them via the exchange and would have to consider either a direct policy or if you have your own business, you may qualify for coverage (you no longer need two employees on the plan, but you do either need to have a husband/wife partnership that filed that way last year or at least one W2 employee - whether full or part time) that will give you access to the larger PPO networks. Contact me for specific details.

4. If you don't receive a subsidy, going outside of the exchange may give you more choices. Harken is leaving the Exchange market, but is still around if you go directly to them.

5. Some of you reading this won't be able to afford ANYTHING. If you fall into this category, I have several non-insurance programs that will avoid the penalty and typically cost significantly less (1/2 to 1/5 the cost of insurance). They do cover your bills, but you need to agree to their principals. Some have holes in the plan that need to be filled with another product, but overall, something is better than nothing.

Use this link to schedule a 15 minute call to discuss your situation.

https://www.timetrade.com/book/XLKVK+

Robert Slayton



Monday, October 12, 2015

Predicting Health Insurance Rates for 2016 in Illinois

Predicting Health Insurance Rates for 2016 in Illinois

By Robert Slayton

One good thing that came out of the Affordable Care Act is that any insurance company that is going to raise premiums more than 10 percent for individual or small group medical plans is required to file with the Federal Government. This information is made public so we can review it.
Unlike other states, Illinois has no authority to prevent the increases from being implemented as requested (this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but just the way it is in Illinois). Based upon those rate increase requests, we have a pretty good idea of who will be the competitive players in the market for 2016.

BCBS of IL has requested increases from 12.83% to 38.24% for ACA plans. As a result, BCBS of IL is eliminating the Blue PPO (large PPO network) option in 2016 for ACA plans. All members on this plan will be migrated to the smaller Blue Choice network (which has about 40% of the doctors/hospitals as the larger network). This will impact approximately 173,000 people. Also expect BCBS to eliminate other plans that have been unprofitable.

If you are on a transitional plan, (plans written after 3/23/2010 to 12/31/2014) you may see increases of over 46%.

Coventry, Humana, and Health Alliance have also requested increases. If you look at the table below, it shows, generally, which increase impacts which plan. If you are on a subsidized plan, you will not see as dramatic of an increase if your income has stayed the same. Subsidies are based upon the second lowest silver plan. The assumption is that this plan will be more expensive in 2016 therefore providing you with a bigger subsidy. For everyone else, it will be a choice of paying the increase or keeping cable.

Aetna (who owns Coventry), Land of Lincoln Health, and IlliniCare are not listed as requesting a rate increase even though I’ve heard rumblings that some have. If we go with the assumption that they will increase rates less than 10%, then these will be some of the players who will win business away from BCBS.

One unknown is Land of Lincoln Health. I’ve had conversations with a board member who says the financials look good (doesn’t mean that they made a profit as it is difficult for any start up to make a profit in the first several years). If they continue to perform as they have, I’d say they will be the company most move to.

Expect all insurance companies to modify the plans they offer. We probably won’t know what these will look like until open enrollment begins on 11/1.

Below are the rates increase requests for ACA compliant plans.




For Transitional plans, here’s the rate table.


Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Opportunities to Purchase a Health Insurance Plan after Open Enrollment

Opportunities to Purchase a Health Insurance Plan after Open Enrollment

The grid below comes from BCBS of IL (but applies to ALL states) and articulates what is considered a special enrollment, who is impacted, the timeline, and when a new policy would be effective. If you are unsure, ALWAYS talk to me as this chart doesn’t cover all circumstances.

NOTE: You can always purchase a Short Term Medical policy outside of open enrollment and special enrollment periods. Contact me for more information.

NOTE2: You can sign up for Medicaid at any time if you qualify (there are no enrollment periods).

Qualifying events can initiate a Special Enrollment Period (SEP) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and may allow your clients a window of time to select a new benefit policy or make a change to an existing policy. Here are events, enrollment dates and effective dates that may trigger an SEP. Categories that warrant special enrollment periods may be added in the future if other appropriate circumstances, as determined by CMS, become known.
Qualifying Event
Enrollment Period
Effective Date
Applicable to both Marketplace and non-Marketplace (on- and off-Exchange) Policies
Gaining/losing a dependent through birth/adoption/foster care/placement for adoption
60 days
Date of event
Gaining a dependent through marriage
First day of the following month after the event
Loss of Minimum Essential Health Coverage (MEC)*
Loss of eligible coverage from:
  • Legal separation/divorce
  • Cessation of dependent status (aging out)
  • Death
  • Termination or reduction of working hours with employer
Loss of coverage through an HMO due to relocation (applicable to both group and individual markets)
Incurs claim that meets or exceeds lifetime limits on all benefits
COBRA coverage ends
Employer ceases contributions either to subscriber or dependents
60 days
First day of the following month after the event
Permanent move
If the selection of the plan happens between first and fifteenth – the effective date is the first of the next month.
If the selection of the plan happens after the fifteenth – the effective date is the first of the second following month.
Newly eligible/ineligible for advanced payments of tax credits or change in eligibility from cost-sharing reductions
Qualified Health Plan (QHP) substantially violates a material provision of its contract
Enrollment in QHP is made in error
Applicable to non-Marketplace (off-Exchange) Policies Only
Enrollment in non-calendar year policy ends
30 days
Date of event
Applicable to Marketplace (on-Exchange) Policies Only
Native American status
60 days
Eligible to enroll or change QHP policies on monthly basis
Attaining citizenship
Date of event
Demonstration of exceptional circumstances, as determined by the Exchange
Date of event

*Does not include loss of MEC due to failure to make premium payment and situations for allowable rescissions.

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Two Year Extension Granted on Canceled Health Plans

Two Year Extension Granted on Canceled Health Plans   

 By Larry Grudzien
(AP) - Warding off the specter of election-year health insurance cancellations, the Obama administration Wednesday announced a two-year extension for individual policies that don't meet requirements of the new health care law.

The decision helps defuse a political problem for Democrats in tough re-election battles this fall, especially for senators who in 2010 stood with President Barack Obama and voted to pass his health overhaul.

The extension was part of a major package of regulations that sets ground rules for 2015, the second year of government-subsidized health insurance markets under Obama's law - and the first year that larger employers will face a requirement to provide coverage.

Hundreds of pages of provisions affecting insurers, employers and consumers were issued by the Treasury department and the Department of Health and Human Services. It will likely take days for lawyers and consultants to fully assess the implications.

The cancellation last fall of at least 4.7 million individual policies was one of the most damaging issues in the transition to a new insurance system under Obama's law. The wave of cancellations hit around the time that the new HealthCare.gov website was overwhelmed with technical problems that kept many consumers from signing up for coverage. It contradicted Obama's promise that you can keep your insurance plan if you like it.

The latest extension would be valid for policies issued up to Oct. 1, 2016. It builds on an earlier reprieve issued by the White House.

REGULATION HIGHLIGHTS


Other highlights of the regulations include:

- An extra month for the 2015 open enrollment season. It will still start Nov. 15, as originally scheduled, after the congressional midterm elections. But it will extend for an additional month, through February 15 of next year. The administration says the schedule change gives insurers, states and federal agencies more time to prepare. This year's open enrollment started Oct. 1 and ends Mar. 31.

- New maximum out-of-pocket cost levels for 2015. Annual deductibles and copayments for plans sold on the insurance exchanges can't exceed $6,600 for individuals or $13,200 for families. While not as high as what some insurance plans charged before the law, cost sharing remains a stretch for many.

-An update on an unpopular per-member fee paid by most major employer health plans. The assessment for 2015 will be $44 per enrollee, according to the regulations. Revenues from the fee go to help insurers cushion the cost of covering people with serious medical problems. Under the law, insurance companies can no longer turn the sick away. The per-person fee has been criticized by major employers. It is $63 per enrollee this year, and is scheduled to phase out after 2016. Some plans, including multi-employer arrangements administered by labor unions, will be exempt from fees in 2015 and 2016.

-Treasury rules for employers and insurers to report information that's crucial for enforcing the law's requirements that individuals carry health insurance, and that medium-to-large employers offer coverage. Although officials said the reporting requirements have been streamlined, businesses see them as some of the most complicated regulations to result from the health care law. The Internal Revenue Service will collect the information, because it is in charge of dispensing tax credits for individuals and small businesses to buy coverage as well as levying fines on those who fail to comply. The individual mandate is already in effect; the employer requirement begins to phase in next year.

-Notice of a potential delay, optional for states, in a promised feature of new health insurance markets for small businesses. The feature would allow individual employees - not the business owner - to pick their coverage from a list of plans. The health insurance exchanges for small businesses have been troubled by technical issues this year. Small Business Majority, a group that supports the health care law, said it's disappointed. The administration says no final decision has been made.

HOW MANY AFFECTED?


It's not clear how many people will actually be affected by the most closely watched provision of the new regulations, the two-year extension on policies that were previously subject to cancellation. The administration cites a congressional estimate of 1.5 million, counting individual plans and small business policies.

About half the states have allowed insurance companies to extend canceled policies for a year under the original White House reprieve. The policies usually provided less financial protection and narrower benefits than the coverage required under the law. Nonetheless, the skimpier insurance was acceptable to many consumers because it generally cost less.

"It's not likely to affect a large number of people but it certainly avoids difficult anecdotes about people having their policies canceled," said Larry Levitt of the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation, an expert on insurance markets. "I think it's a small and dwindling number of people who are affected."

For More Information:

If you have any comments or questions regarding any of above information, please do not hesitate to call me at 630-779-1144 or Larry Grudzien at (708) 717-9638 

Friday, November 15, 2013

Obama's "You Can Keep Your Plan" Announcement Isn't Up to Him

It's been awhile since I've posted due to trying to see every client I have along with renewing most of my groups with a December renewal date, but I thought I'd jump into the fray.

1. I've been amazed at how many times the Oval Office has made an announcement changing the law without due process. If a law is passed and someone wants to amend it, typically an amendment needs to be written and approved. This has not been the case with the Affordable Care Act (sorry, it's a beef of mine - I believe in following due process).

2. Now that the President has stated that insurance companies may be allowed to continue their plans up to the end of 2014, both the Directors of Insurance of each state AND the insurance companies within each state now need to make decisions.

3. The Director of Insurance (DoI) is the person who can decide whether to allow insurance companies to continue existing plans within that state. If the DoI chooses to disallow it, then it will be as if the President didn't make that announcement.

4. If the DoI says yes, the individual insurance companies can still say no. Insurance companies need to weigh the split in risk pools this may cause (or if they are pooling the risk pools, how the decrease in premium for existing plans will impact it). One of the reasons to force people onto the new plans is to get enough healthy people in the risk pool to pay for the unhealthy people. The whole risk model will change if this is the case and insurance companies need to carefully assess whether this makes sense. Furthermore, if insurance companies have already cancelled plans or people have chosen plans to migrate to, will the insurance companies be willing to go back and allow people to back on their old plans?

5. Let's say that insurance companies choose to continue existing plans. Policyholders should still see an increase in their premiums due to the new taxes that the Affordable Care Act has imposed. You have the $5.25/month belly button tax (transitional reinsurance fee paid for each person on a health insurance plan), person's portion of the health insurer tax (around 3% - 4% of the cost of the plan), and patient centered research outcome fee of $2/year. For a family of 4 whose current premium is $1000/month, this will mean the following extra costs: $21/month, $35/month (estimated at 3.5% health insurer fee), and $0.17/month pcori fee ($57.17/month total) assuming no other items included.

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

New World, New Rates for Obamacare (Affordable Care Act). How it impacts Me.

The first thing I did this morning when I got to the office was to try to get into healthcare.gov. When that didn't work, I knew I could still get rates via each individual carrier. So I worked and got the three closest plans to what I have now to compare current plans and rates to plans and rates 1/1/2014. Here is what I found.

My current plan is a $5200 family deductible HSA plan via Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois. It pays 100% after I meet the deductible. My current premium is about $600/month for a family of 4.

Below is a snapshot of the three closest plans I could find. (Land of Lincoln, BCBS of IL, and Aetna respectively).



The first thing I noticed was that I COULD NOT find a plan similar to what I have now. Furthermore, the smallest out of pocket maximum for a family was OVER $12,000 for an HSA compatible plan.

You may say that $758.97/month is reasonable, but please remember that I was paying less than $600/month for better coverage ($5200 maximum out of pocket for everything instead of $12,700 maximum out of pocket).

I tried quoting Coventry, but their website said there were no plans available and Health Alliance's rates were high and not as graphic as above because they just have rate sheets. Of course those two carriers are not available in DuPage County, so that is another reason I didn't list them here. DuPage County only has BCBS of Illinois, Aetna, and Land of Lincoln.

Now you may be saying that these are unsubsidized rates and you'd be correct. We need to keep in mind that SOMEBODY is paying for the plan, even if your share is at 50%. Note also that two out of 3 plans are Bronze level plans meaning that the costs are less than a Silver plan. Unfortunately, there were no Silver plans that were similar to what I have now. They just weren't offered. 

I'll be curious to see the comparison once the government website is up and running. More posts as the time goes on.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Updated IRS Form 720 available for Health Plans to Pay new ACA fee due July 31

Updated IRS Form 720 available for Health Plans to Pay new ACA fee due July 31

By Larry Grudzien , Attorney at Law

With health plans or policies facing a July 31 due date to pay the first patient-centered outcomes research fees, IRS has issued a revised Form 720 and instructions. Filers will enter covered lives subject to the $1 fee for the 2012 plan or policy year in Part II of Form 720 (line 133) to calculate the amount owed. Though Form 720 is used for quarterly excise taxes, filers should only complete line 133 when remitting the annual fee due July 31. Under the Affordable Care Act, the new fee applies to each plan or policy year that ends on or after Oct. 1, 2012, and before Oct. 1, 2019. 
 
Link to Full text of Form 720 (IRS, 3 Jun 2013) (PDF):
 
 
Link to Full text of Form 720 instructions for Part II, line 133 (IRS, 3 Jun 2013):

 
IRS webpage with Form 720, instructions, and related materials:


For More Information:
If you have any comments or questions regarding any of above information, please do not hesitate to call Larry Grudzien at (708) 717-9638 or Robert Slayton at 630-779-1144.

Friday, May 31, 2013

Affordable Care Act Open Enrollment FAQ for the Individual Market

Good stuff from BCBS of IL on when an individual can enroll in a health insurance plan.


May 29, 2013

Legislative Update
Affordable Care Act Question of the Week: Exchange Open Enrollment [All Markets]

We have received a number of questions about the initial open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Beginning Jan. 1, 2014, most U.S. citizens and legal residents will be required to have a minimum level of health care coverage. If you have a general question about an ACA provision, contact your account representative.

Q: If an uninsured does not enroll through a health insurance exchange (also known as a health insurance marketplace) during the open enrollment period for coverage effective Jan. 1, 2014, under what circumstances may an individual enroll and receive coverage during 2014?

A: The initial open enrollment period for the exchange begins Oct. 1, 2013, and extends through March 31, 2014.

If an individual does not enroll during the initial open enrollment period or future enrollment periods (for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2015, the annual open enrollment period begins Oct. 15 and extends through Dec. 7 of the preceding calendar year), they can enroll if circumstances triggered one of the following events:

A qualified individual and any dependents losing other minimum essential coverage.
A qualified individual gaining or becoming a dependent through marriage, birth, adoption or placement for adoption.
An individual, not previously lawfully present, gaining status as a citizen, national or lawfully present individual in the United States.
A qualified individual experiencing an error in enrollment.
An individual enrolled in a Qualified Health Plan (QHP) adequately demonstrating to the exchange that the QHP in which he or she is enrolled substantially violated a material provision of its contract.
An individual becoming newly eligible or newly ineligible for advance payments of the premium tax credit or experiencing a change in eligibility for cost-sharing reductions.
New QHPs offered through the exchange becoming available to a qualified individual or enrollee as a result of a permanent move.
The individual is an Indian, as defined by the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. (We solicited comment on the potential implications on the process for verifying Indian status for purposes of this special enrollment period.)
A qualified individual or enrollee meeting other exceptional circumstances, as determined by the Exchange or Health & Human Services (HHS). Loss of coverage does not include failure to pay premiums on a timely basis, including COBRA premiums prior to expiration of COBRA coverage.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, an individual or enrollee has 60 days from the date of a triggering event to select a plan. Note: This 60-day Special Enrollment Period (SEP) window applies to the individual market. Group market is 30 days for the SEP window.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Find high quality Labs, Tests, and Meds for Cheap

Many people seem to think that when your doctor recommends a test, you need to get it done where they want you to get it done. Nothing can be further from the truth. You can research and choose a high quality facility who charges less than half the price of your doctor's facility and have the results sent directly to the doctor.

The same goes for prescription drugs, just by calling around you can find that certain pharmacies charge a lot less for a drug than another. There are even online options which could save you even more money.

As deductibles and prescription copays have steadily increased, it's a good thing to shop around.

Low Cost Labs and Tests

Most labs and tests vary by up to 300%, so why not go to a place that's less expensive. There are two sites to check out when looking for a lab or test (BTW, you will still need a prescription from your doctor for the test, so get that before you walk out the door).

Leslieslist.org

This is a great site that is fed by you and I and includes rates for the most common tests and prescriptions. Here is one example in the Chicagoland area. If it includes the procedure you need, then it's a great resource.

Colonoscopy

In Chicago, the pricing goes from $700+ (probably under $1000) to $2500. Most hospitals actually charge around $2500 - $3500 for the same procedure.

BTW, a friend of mine has negotiated with a doctor to do a full colonoscopy with polop removal for a flat $800 in Hinsdale. You pay upfront and deal with your insurance company. If you want more info, let me know.

Simvestatin, 30 mg tablets for high cholesterol

Leslieslist includes pricing at various drug stores from Costo to Walmart. The range for this generic is $11 for 100 tablets to $42 for 30 tablets.

Yousaveonlabs.com 

Yousaveonlabs is run by mdlabtests.com. You can put in your test and it will come up with the cost and allow you to pre-pay for the lab/test. You show up with your receipt and prescriptions, they perform the test and send it to your doctor. Many of these labs are the very same labs that process the tests done at your doctor's office anyway.

Low Cost Prescriptions

Yousaveonmeds.com

Yousaveonmeds allows you to purchase meds from around the world. It is run by a colleague of mine, Marty Portnoy. The key difference is that you need to talk to him before you can order. This means that if you require an FDIC approved manufacturer (from an outside country), he can help guide you to that manufacturer. He even provides a US receipt you can turn into your insurance company.

BidRx.com

This is a nifty site based in the US. You put in your meds and pharmacies bid on them using a reverse auction format. As far as I understand, it is all United States based pharmacies and drugs.

Summary

If you use these sites, you'll be able be a better consumer and keep more of your money in your pocket.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Health Reform Questions - Premium Tax Credits & Cost-Sharing Subsidies


Health Reform Questions 

- Premium Tax Credits & Cost-Sharing Subsidies                 

By Larry Grudzien

 What premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies are available to individuals in 2014 and who is eligible for them?


To assist individuals and families who do not qualify for Medicare or Medicaid and are not offered affordable health coverage by their employers, a refundable tax credit (the "premium tax credit") and a cost sharing subsidy will be available beginning in 2014 to help pay for insurance purchased through an Exchange. Generally, taxpayers with income between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty line (FPL) who purchase insurance through an Exchange will qualify them, as provided in Code Section 36B. and Section 1402 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA").

A premium assistance tax credit will be provided monthly to lower the amount of premium the individual or family must pay for their coverage. Cost sharing subsidies will limit the plan's maximum out-of-pocket costs, and for some individuals will also reduce other cost sharing amounts (i.e., deductibles, coinsurance or copayments) that would otherwise be charged to them by their coverage.

Both types of assistance will be tied in some way to the value of the coverage available in the Exchanges. Four levels of plans will be offered by insurers in the exchanges. All the plans must offer a set of essential health benefits. The four plan levels vary in the total value of coverage they must provide. This amount is sometimes called "actuarial value" and represents the proportion of health insurance expenditures for covered benefits that, for an average population, would be paid by the plan. Section 1302(d)(1) of PPACA requires that the actuarial value be 60% for "bronze" plans, 70% for "silver" plans, 80% for "gold" plans and 90% for "platinum" plans. In addition, the out-of-pocket maximum for any of these plans may not exceed a limit that is determined annually. For 2013, the limit is $6,250 for individual coverage and $12,500 for family coverage.  It will be adjusted higher for 2014.

Who is eligible for the premium tax credit and cost sharing subsidy?


Citizens and legal residents in families with incomes between 100% and 400% of poverty who purchase coverage through a health insurance exchange are eligible for a premium tax credit cost sharing subsidy to reduce the cost of coverage. individuals eligible for public coverage are not eligible for premium assistance in Exchanges. In states without expanded Medicaid coverage, individuals with incomes less than 100% of poverty will not be eligible for Exchange subsidies, while those with incomes at or above poverty will be.

Would an individual be eligible for premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies in the Exchange if he or she is offered "minimum essential coverage" by his or her employer in that it is both affordable and provides minimum value, but declines it and obtains coverage in the Exchange?


No. As a general rule, if an eligible employer-sponsored plan constitutes "minimum essential coverage" in that it is both affordable and provides minimum value merely being eligible for the plan will make an individual ineligible for the tax credit. In  Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-2(c)(3)(iii)(A), the IRS indicates that an eligible employee who declines enrollment in such a plan remains ineligible for the tax credit for each month in the coverage period related to the enrollment period (e.g., for the full plan year in the case of an annual enrollment period).

Would an individual be eligible for premium tax credits and cost sharing subsidies in the Exchange if he or she is enrolled coverage offered by his or employer that is either unaffordable and does not provides minimum value?


If an employee actually enrolls in an eligible employer-sponsored plan, the tax credit is not available-even if the plan does not meet the affordability and minimum value conditions, as provided in Code Section 36B(c)(2)(C)(iii). Employees who are automatically enrolled in an eligible employer-sponsored plan have a grace period to unwind the enrollment to maintain their eligibility for the tax credit, as provided in Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-2(c)(3)(vii)(B). An employee is not considered eligible for minimum essential coverage (i.e., may qualify for the tax credit) during any required waiting period before coverage becomes effective under an eligible employer-sponsored plan. The IRS is expected to provide a safe harbor under which an employer would not have to pay the shared responsibility tax penalty under Code § 4980H for failing to offer coverage for at least the first three months after an employee's hire date, as provided in Department of Labor Technical Release 2012-01, Q/A-3.

Individuals who meet these thresholds for unaffordable employer-sponsored insurance are eligible to enroll in a health insurance exchange and may receive tax credits to reduce the cost of coverage purchased through the exchange.

What are the amounts of the premium tax credit and cost- sharing subsidies to be provided?


Under Code Section 36B(b), the amount of the tax credit that a person can receive is based on the premium for the second lowest cost silver plan in the Exchange . A silver plan is a plan that provides the essential benefits and has an actuarial value of 70%. (A 70% actuarial value means that on average the plan pays 70% of the cost of covered benefits for a standard population of enrollees.)

Under Code Section 36B(b)(3), the amount of the tax credit varies with income such that the premium that the premium a person would have to pay for the second lowest cost silver plan would not exceed a specified percentage of their income (adjusted for family size), as follows:


Household Income (as percentage of  Federal Poverty Line (FPL) Premium as a Percent of Household Income

Up to133%           2%  of income
133-150%             3-4% of income
150-200%             4-6.3% of income
200-250%             6.3-8.05%  of income
250-300%             8.05-9.5% of income
300-400%             9.5% of income
 
In addition, Section 1402(b) of PPACA limits the total amount that people must pay out-of-pocket for cost sharing for essential benefits. Generally, the limits are based on the maximum out-of-pocket limits for Health Savings Account-qualified health plans ($6,250 for single coverage and $12,500 for family coverage in 2013), which will be indexed to the change in the Consumer Price Index until 2014 when the provision takes effect.

After 2014, the limits will be indexed to the change in the cost of health Coverage. Individuals with incomes at or below 400% of federal poverty line have their out-of-pocket liability capped at lower levels, as follows:
Household Income (as percentage of Federal Poverty Line (FPL) 

Reduction in Out-of-Pocket Liability
100-200%             Two-thirds of the maximum
200-300%             One-half of the maximum
300-400%             One-third of the maximum
 
The limits on out-of-pocket maximum amounts means that a person with income of 150% of poverty purchasing coverage in the exchange would have the limit on their out-of-pocket spending reduced to at least two-thirds of the generally applicable maximum value (for example, if the provision were in effect in 2013, the out-of-pocket maximum for single coverage for such a person would be about $2,083 for single coverage and $4,166 for family coverage).

In addition, Section 1402(c) of PPACA provides that federal payments will be made to health insurers to increase the actuarial value of the plan for individuals with household incomes under 250% of the federal poverty line. For example, for individuals with household incomes between 100% and 150% of federal poverty line, the actuarial value of the plan will be increased to 94%. That means that in addition to keeping within the lower out of pocket maximums established above, insurers must make other changes to increase the actuarial value of the coverage. Most likely this will mean reducing plan deductibles, coinsurance or copayments in order to meet the higher actuarial value requirements.

For individuals with household incomes over 250% of federal poverty line, the actuarial value of their plan may not exceed 70%, which is the basic value of the silver plan even for those who receive no financial assistance. This means that, for some individuals, some cost sharing amounts could increase. That would happen if their out of pocket maximum was decreased to keep within the required lower maximum, because the deductibles, copayments or coinsurance that would otherwise apply would have to be increased to keep the actuarial value at 70%.

The last cost sharing subsidy is summarized below:

Household Income (as percentage of Federal Poverty Line (FPL) Net Value of the Subsidy (% of Actuarial Value)
Out-of-Pocket Liability
100-150%                            94%
150-200%                         87%
200-250%                         73%
250-400%                         70%

Who determines an individual's eligibility for the premium tax credit and the cost-sharing subsidies?


Under 45 CFR Section 155.300, HHS is requiring the Exchanges to establish a system of coordinated eligibility and enrollment so that an individual can simultaneously apply for enrollment in a Qualified Health Plan ("QHP"), as well as Insurance Affordability Programs ("IAPs"), including the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reductions. Under Treasury Proposed Regulation Section 301.6103(l)(21). The IRS is permitted to disclose income and other specified information about an individual taxpayer to HHS for purposes of making eligibility determinations for advance payments of the premium tax credit or the cost-sharing reductions.

When an individual purchases a Qualified Health Plan how are any credits and subsidies applied?


Under the Actuarial Value and Cost-Sharing Reductions Bulletin (released by HHS), when an individual receives covered essential health benefits, the provider would collect from the individual only the amount of cost-sharing specified in the silver plan variation in which the individual is enrolled. The federal government would pay in advance to the insurer amounts estimated to cover the cost-sharing reductions associated with the specific silver plan variation. HHS intends to propose that this advance cost-sharing reduction payment to the insurer would occur monthly, and that after the end of the calendar year, the federal government would reconcile the advance payments to actual cost-sharing reduction amounts. 

The Exchange must report to the IRS and to each taxpayer required information for the Qualified Health Plan in which the employee (or a member of the employee's family) is enrolled through the Exchange, as provided in Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-4. In turn, individuals who receive advance payments of the premium tax credit must file an income tax return for that taxable year, as provided in Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-5.

For More Information:

If you have any comments or questions regarding any of above information, please do not hesitate to call (708) 717-9638 or e-mail at  larry[at]larrygrudzien[dot]com

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Look to the state of Washington to see what a health insurance death spiral looks like.


Here's an older article talking about what happened in the state of Washington. Focus on the pre-ex clause. Even with an individual mandate (which doesn't impact 47% of the population and the rest will be a very minor penalty). If we don't impose a pre-existing condition clause on a person who chooses NOT to take coverage during an "open enrollment period" then we will have the same issues as Washington did. It's not the individual mandate, it's also the pre-ex that can kill insurance.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/03/30/want-to-see-a-health-insurance-death-spiral-visit-washington-state/

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Family Health Premiums reach $15,745 this year and how much you'll need to pay in 2014

I was reading USA Today this morning and an article listed two surveys stating that the average cost of coverage for a family is $15,745/year (http://usat.ly/PiBDpC) with employees paying $4,300/year of that cost. This translates into a 4% increase from last year, but with salary increases flat, the average family just lost buying power.

That said, let's see how the Affordable Care Act will impact the employee's portion of the cost of insurance in 2014. Here are the actual percent payouts based upon family income:

  • 150% - 200% of Federal Poverty Level (FPL) equals people paying up to 6.3% of their income on health insurance. 
  • 201% - 250% of FPL equals 8.05% of their income on health insurance. 
  • 250% - 400% FPL equals 9.5% of their income on health insurance.

Let's see how this stacks up with the $4,300/year the average family pays towards their health insurance (assuming a family of 4).
In 2012, the FPL is $23,050 for a family of four.
150% of FPL = $34,575/year of income with a maximum spent on health insurance being $2,178.23.
200% of FPL = $46,100/year of income with a maximum spent on health insurance being $3,711.05.
250% of FPL = $57,625/year of income with a maximum spent on health insurance being $5,474.38.

What this means, especially in the Chicagoland area, is that you won't notice a change in your premium when health reform occurs. What health reform gives you is an opportunity of purchasing your own coverage and NOT being depended upon your employer. It will be interesting to see how many employees leave to start their own businesses or become consultants.

[Removed]

Again, the Affordable Care Act is not what it is hyped to be. There will be no "free healthcare" for the majority of Americans. Most likely, they will be paying the same or a little bit more for their coverage than what they are paying now. The best part of health reform is that anyone can obtain a plan (guaranteed issue), with no pre-existing conditions (everything is covered from day one - as long as the insurance plan covers the conditions), and a person cannot be charged an extra premium other than if they are a smoker (community rating).


Thursday, August 23, 2012

Compliance Questions -HSAs and Health FSAs - Eligibility Issues


Compliance Questions -HSAs and Health FSAs - Eligibility Issues     

August 23, 2012

One of my employees just enrolled in a High Deductible Health Plan ("HDHP") and is now eligible to contribute to a Health Savings Account ("HSA").  A few months ago, his spouse enrolled in a general- purpose Health Flexible Spending Account ("Health FSA").  She enrolled the whole family, including her spouse. If the spouse never submits claims for her husband, is he still eligible to contribute to an HSA?

No.

Individuals who are covered by traditional, general-purpose Health FSA are not eligible for HSA contributions. This rule applies whether the individual is the participant in the Health FSA or simply someone whose expenses can be reimbursed-both are considered "covered." Thus, an employee's spouse will not be eligible for HSA contributions if the spouse's qualified medical expenses can be paid or reimbursed under the general purpose Health FSA in which the employee participates, as provided in Revenue Ruling 2004-45 and IRS Notice 2005-86. Nothing in the guidance limits this principle to spouses, so adult children and other individuals (e.g., domestic partners) who have HDHP coverage-and thus might otherwise be able to make contributions to their own HSAs-will not be eligible to make HSA contributions if they are also covered by a family member's general-purpose Health FSA. 

A family member's eligibility may be preserved if the Health FSA excludes him or her from coverage. But at the present time, it is unusual for a Health FSA to restrict coverage, for example, solely to the covered employee or solely to the covered employee and children (but not the spouse). Most of these arrangements allow benefits for any eligible tax dependent. Plan documents and administrative procedures would need to be redesigned in order to facilitate such an "employee-only" or "employee-plus-children (but not spouse)" coverage option. It is not sufficient for an individual to simply promise not to request reimbursement (even if the promise is kept and no claims are ever submitted).

In general, an individual who is covered by a general-purpose Health FSA will be ineligible for HSA contributions for the individual's entire period of coverage under the Health FSA -even after the individual has completely exhausted his or her Health FSA.

Although an individual generally will not be eligible to contribute to an HSA for the entire period of coverage under a general-purpose Health FSA even if the Health FSA account balance has been exhausted, an individual with a $0 balance at plan year-end under a general-purpose Health FSA with a grace period can disregard that Health FSA coverage and be HSA-eligible during the grace period, as provided in IRS Notice 2007-22. This rule requires that the $0 balance be determined on a cash basis and taking into account the uniform coverage rule. Cash basis means the balance as of the relevant date, without taking into account expenses that have not been reimbursed as of that date. Thus, pending claims, claims submitted, claims received, or claims under review that have not been paid as of a date are not taken into account. 

Written by:
Larry Grudzien
Attorney-At-Law
Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law | 708 South Kenilworth Ave. | Oak Park | IL | 60304

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Coordination of Benefits for Medicare Eligible People


You will be turning 65 soon (become Medicare Eligible), but still plan on working for your employer for several more years. Do you need to take Medicare parts A and B? 

The answer is it depends. Below is a snippet from a Humana newsletter that tried to explain how it works (BTW, this is for almost all insurance companies/plans):

Coordinating Medicare and employer health plans isn't a complicated proposition if you know the facts. Active employees cannot be dropped from employer group health plans without violating the federal Age Discrimination Employment Act (ADEA) except in specific circumstances. Medicare secondary payer rules also prohibit employers from reducing health benefits to current employees because of their Medicare eligibility. Plus, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued an informal letter late last year that advised the exemption for coordination with Medicare is only applicable to retirees, not current employees. As older workers delay retirement – or opt to forego retirement altogether, the need for clarity on how to navigate coordination of Medicare and employer-based insurance has become crucial.

Coordination requirements depend on the size of the employer-based healthcare plan.

Under a small group plan, defined as 20 or fewer employees, Medicare becomes the primary health coverage for eligible employees. The employee might not have health insurance if he or she declines Medicare Part B coverage, outpatient, and doctors benefits. Expenses of Part B-eligible employees who become injured and are covered by the group health plan can see the program stop payment – or attempt to recoup payments – creating a nightmarish scenario for employees. An employer who decides to remain the primary payer (an option currently allowed) must receive written confirmation from the employee and the health plan.

In large group plans of 20 or more employees, the amount of coverage employers must provide changes. The employee is not required to opt for Part B but can accept Part B as secondary coverage. When the employee stops working, Part B becomes the primary payer. In the case of a multiple-employer plan, the size of the largest employer dictates whether the group plan size is small or large and therefore, the category of coordination requirements and coverage to which all the employers in the group must adhere.

Additional guidance is available from several sources. National nonprofit consumer service group Medicare Rights Center, along with Cook County, Illinois-based AgeOptions, created a toolkit of educational materials on this subject. The toolkit, "How Medicare Works with Employer-Based Health Insurance: A Guide for Employers, Professionals and Consumers," is designed to help older workers knowledgeably make their way through the transition from employer-based health insurance to Medicare. 


Now in Illinois, if you are enrolled in an HMO plan for an employer with LESS THAN 20 employees, you actually do NOT need to get Part B as an HMO treats payments differently than other plans. That said, please check with your employer/health insurance agent FIRST to confirm that this is still the case in your situation.

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Transitional reinsurance program may add 3% - 4% to costs for individual and group health insurance according to United Healthcare

United Healthcare and Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield both send out information on the transitional reinsurance program which is a part of the Affordable Care Act. According to United Healthcare, this program will increase cost 3% to 4% starting in 2014. The purpose of the reinsurance program is to stabilize the premiums of insurers who take on high cost people (think about your Aunt Edna who is 400 pounds, has high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, takes 8 medications/day and needs a double knee replacement) in the individual market due to it being guaranteed issue with no pre-existing conditions. This plan will compensate those insurance companies who insure those individuals. The reinsurance program fees will total $12 billion in 2014 and gradually decrease to $5 billion in 2016. States can actually increase these fees at their discretion.

What this means is that the average cost of a health insurance plan will be 3%-4% higher in 2014 due to this reinsurance program alone (fees are ultimately passed on to consumers).

Also starting September 30, 2012 there is a new fee assessed on health insurers (and self insured plans) of $1 per covered life and increasing to $2 per covered life in the second year. This fee helps to fund research on the effectiveness of medical treatments conducted by the new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). The good news is that the most effective treatments will be found and recommended. The bad news is that I wouldn't be surprised if expensive and obscure treatments are "defunded" from health insurance plans (excluded from coverage). That second item is only speculation, but it seems to correlate with many single payer systems around the world.

By the way, if you offer an HRA, even if it is in conjunction with a fully insured plan, it is considered a self-funded plan and you will need to submit those fees to the government. Yes, this means you pay twice.

More updates will be coming.


Wednesday, August 1, 2012

New HSA Guidelines for 2013


New HSA Guidelines for 2013


Here are some highlights for 2013.


Annual:
2013
2012
Minimum Individual Deductible
$1,250
$1,200
Minimum Family Deductible
$2,500
$2,400
Maximum Individual Out-of-Pocket (in network)
$6,250
$6,050
Maximum Family Out-of-Pocket (in network)
$12,500
$12,100
Maximum HSA Individual Contribution
$3,250
$3,100
Maximum HSA Family Contribution
$6,450
$6,250

  1. Maximum contributions are $3250 for an individual (up $150) and $6450 for a family (up $200). Person’s aged 55 years old and older can add an additional $1000/year as a catch up contribution (no change).

  2. Minimum Deductibles are the same. The minimum deductible for an individual plan is $1,250 and for a family it is $2,500.

  3. Catch up contributions for those 55 years old and older is still $1,000/year.

  4. Maximum out of pocket has changed. The maximum out of pocket (including deductible) on an individual plan is now $6250 (up $200) and for a family it is $12,500 (up $400).

Items that haven’t changed, but are beneficial to know.

  • You can put the full amount in immediately without waiting (This even applies to new hires or a person starting an HSA qualified health plan in the middle of a calendar year).

  • You can put the maximum contribution into your HSA account, regardless of your deductible.

  • A person can choose to accumulate HSA qualified expenses over the course of years (instead of taking the expenses out of the HSA account at the time of service). Every year they need to fill out a Form 8889 and carry the balances forward. At 65 years old, they can then take a distribution equal to the total amount of expenses incurred tax free.

  • An individual can take a one-time distribution from their IRA to fund their HSA account.

  • As always, you have until April 15th (or when you file your taxes) to contribute to your HSA savings account for last year.

Check with your accountant for more information on how this would specifically apply to you.

Here is a link to the original IRS announcement: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-12-26.pdf.

Copyright 2012 Robert C Slayton