Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Noncalendar Plan Years & the Employer Mandate in 2014


Noncalendar Plan Years & the Employer Mandate in 2014      

February 20, 2013 
By Larry Grudzien
Attorney-At-Law

An employer's health plan's plan year begins on September 1 each year.  If the employer is a "large employer" under health care reform, when is the employer subject to the employer mandate, January 1, 2014 or September 1, 2014?

The employer mandate is generally effective on January 1, 2014. However, two transition rules apply that may delay the assessment of penalties until the first day of your first plan year that starts on or after January 1, 2014. The transition rules say that if the employer  maintained a noncalendar year plan as of December 27, 2012, and all of its  full-time employees are offered affordable coverage that provides minimum value no later than that first day of the plan year that starts in 2014, penalties will not be assessed for the months prior to the first day of the plan year that starts in 2014 for:

1. Any employee (whenever hired) that would be eligible for coverage, as of the first day of the first plan year that begins in 2014 under the eligibility terms of the plan as in effect on December 27, 2012; and

2. Any other employees if (a) the employer's noncalendar year plan was offered to at least one third of its employees (full-time and part-time) at the most recent open season; or (b) its noncalendar year plan covered at least one quarter of its employees.

Therefore, for any employees who are eligible to participate in the plan under its terms as of December 27, 2012 (whether or not they take the coverage), the employer will not be subject to a penalty for those employees until the first day of it noncalendar plan year that starts in 2014 if employees are offered affordable coverage that provides minimum value no later than that first day of the plan year that starts in 2014.

For any other employees that were not eligible to participate under the terms of the plan in effect on December 27, 2012, if the employer offered coverage under its noncalendar year plan starting on September 1, 2012 to at least one third of your employees, or if the plan covered at least one quarter of its employees, the employer could avoid liability for a penalty until September 1, 2014 if it expands the plan to offer coverage that is affordable and meets the  minimum required value to the full-time employees who had previously not been offered coverage. For purposes of determining whether the plan covers at least one quarter of the employees, the employer can use any day between October 31, 2012 and December 27, 2012 for doing the calculation.

For More Information:
If you have any comments or questions regarding any of above information, please do not hesitate to call Robert Slayton at 630-779-1144 or Larry Grudzien at (708) 717-9638.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

IRS Issues Guidance on Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit -Clarification

IRS Issues Guidance on Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit -Clarification

February 5, 2013
By Larry Grudzien, Attorney-At-Law

The IRS issued a final regulations on when an employer-sponsored plan is considered "affordable" for an individual related to the employee for purposes of eligibility for a premium tax credit. Under Health Care Reform, employees may be eligible for a premium tax credit to purchase health insurance through the future health insurance exchanges if, among other reasons, the employer plan is deemed unaffordable.

The final regulations clarify that for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2015, an eligible employer-sponsored plan is affordable for related individuals if the portion of the annual premium the employee must pay for self-only coverage does not exceed 9.5% of the taxpayer's household income.

An employer plan will be affordable for family members if the cost of self-only coverage does not exceed 9.5% of the employee's household income. In other words, for purposes of whether family members are eligible for tax credits, the affordability of family coverage is not taken into account; all that matters is that the cost of self-only coverage is affordable to the employee

For purposes of applying the affordability exemption from the individual
mandate in the case of related individuals, the required contribution is based on the premium the employee would pay for employer-sponsored family coverage.

For an employee eligible under an employer plan, affordability (for individual mandate exemption purposes) will be based on whether the cost of self-only coverage exceeds 8% of the employee's household income. For a related individual (such as a spouse or child), however, affordability for this purpose will be based on whether the cost of family coverage exceeds 8% of household income. Under these rules, members of an employee's family may qualify for an individual mandate exemption, even though the offer of affordable employer coverage to the employee would require the employee to enroll or risk paying a penalty.

These final regulations apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 2013.

For a copy of the final regulations, please click on the link below:


If you have any comments or questions regarding any of above information, please do not hesitate to call me (Robert Slayton) at 630-779-1144 or Larry Grudzien at (708) 717-9638.


Thursday, January 31, 2013

Health Reform Resources

As I'm giving a talk today and hate killing trees, I thought I'd create a listing of helpful resources related to the Affordable Care Act's health reform.

Timeline for Implementation put out by the National Association of Health Underwriters

http://robertslayton.com/PPACA_Timeline_Brochure.pdf


Government Websites

Healthreform.gov - The federal government's official website. Although biased, it does include a wealth of information

     -Preventative Services Included in Health Reform:  
       http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2010/07/preventive-services-list.html

Website showing proposed paperwork for employers to prove their plans meet the minimum requirements along with paperwork for individuals to sign up on the exchange.

http://cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/PaperworkReductionActof1995/PRA-Listing.html

Illinois Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Program - if you have been uninsured for 6 or more months and are ineligible for individual health insurance (due to health problems).

http://www.insurance.illinois.gov/ipxp/


Websites with a good overview of the issues

Kaiser Family Foundation is recognized as having one of the best websites on health reform available.


National Center for Policy Analysis - It's view on health reform and how to fix the crisis


Financial Calculators

These are online calculators designed to help assess both individual health insurance exchange subsidies or penalties for businesses.

Small Business Resources

What's crazy about the resources below is that almost all of them were issued within the last 2 months.



Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Find high quality Labs, Tests, and Meds for Cheap

Many people seem to think that when your doctor recommends a test, you need to get it done where they want you to get it done. Nothing can be further from the truth. You can research and choose a high quality facility who charges less than half the price of your doctor's facility and have the results sent directly to the doctor.

The same goes for prescription drugs, just by calling around you can find that certain pharmacies charge a lot less for a drug than another. There are even online options which could save you even more money.

As deductibles and prescription copays have steadily increased, it's a good thing to shop around.

Low Cost Labs and Tests

Most labs and tests vary by up to 300%, so why not go to a place that's less expensive. There are two sites to check out when looking for a lab or test (BTW, you will still need a prescription from your doctor for the test, so get that before you walk out the door).

Leslieslist.org

This is a great site that is fed by you and I and includes rates for the most common tests and prescriptions. Here is one example in the Chicagoland area. If it includes the procedure you need, then it's a great resource.

Colonoscopy

In Chicago, the pricing goes from $700+ (probably under $1000) to $2500. Most hospitals actually charge around $2500 - $3500 for the same procedure.

BTW, a friend of mine has negotiated with a doctor to do a full colonoscopy with polop removal for a flat $800 in Hinsdale. You pay upfront and deal with your insurance company. If you want more info, let me know.

Simvestatin, 30 mg tablets for high cholesterol

Leslieslist includes pricing at various drug stores from Costo to Walmart. The range for this generic is $11 for 100 tablets to $42 for 30 tablets.

Yousaveonlabs.com 

Yousaveonlabs is run by mdlabtests.com. You can put in your test and it will come up with the cost and allow you to pre-pay for the lab/test. You show up with your receipt and prescriptions, they perform the test and send it to your doctor. Many of these labs are the very same labs that process the tests done at your doctor's office anyway.

Low Cost Prescriptions

Yousaveonmeds.com

Yousaveonmeds allows you to purchase meds from around the world. It is run by a colleague of mine, Marty Portnoy. The key difference is that you need to talk to him before you can order. This means that if you require an FDIC approved manufacturer (from an outside country), he can help guide you to that manufacturer. He even provides a US receipt you can turn into your insurance company.

BidRx.com

This is a nifty site based in the US. You put in your meds and pharmacies bid on them using a reverse auction format. As far as I understand, it is all United States based pharmacies and drugs.

Summary

If you use these sites, you'll be able be a better consumer and keep more of your money in your pocket.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Health Reform Questions - Premium Tax Credits & Cost-Sharing Subsidies


Health Reform Questions 

- Premium Tax Credits & Cost-Sharing Subsidies                 

By Larry Grudzien

 What premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies are available to individuals in 2014 and who is eligible for them?


To assist individuals and families who do not qualify for Medicare or Medicaid and are not offered affordable health coverage by their employers, a refundable tax credit (the "premium tax credit") and a cost sharing subsidy will be available beginning in 2014 to help pay for insurance purchased through an Exchange. Generally, taxpayers with income between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty line (FPL) who purchase insurance through an Exchange will qualify them, as provided in Code Section 36B. and Section 1402 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA").

A premium assistance tax credit will be provided monthly to lower the amount of premium the individual or family must pay for their coverage. Cost sharing subsidies will limit the plan's maximum out-of-pocket costs, and for some individuals will also reduce other cost sharing amounts (i.e., deductibles, coinsurance or copayments) that would otherwise be charged to them by their coverage.

Both types of assistance will be tied in some way to the value of the coverage available in the Exchanges. Four levels of plans will be offered by insurers in the exchanges. All the plans must offer a set of essential health benefits. The four plan levels vary in the total value of coverage they must provide. This amount is sometimes called "actuarial value" and represents the proportion of health insurance expenditures for covered benefits that, for an average population, would be paid by the plan. Section 1302(d)(1) of PPACA requires that the actuarial value be 60% for "bronze" plans, 70% for "silver" plans, 80% for "gold" plans and 90% for "platinum" plans. In addition, the out-of-pocket maximum for any of these plans may not exceed a limit that is determined annually. For 2013, the limit is $6,250 for individual coverage and $12,500 for family coverage.  It will be adjusted higher for 2014.

Who is eligible for the premium tax credit and cost sharing subsidy?


Citizens and legal residents in families with incomes between 100% and 400% of poverty who purchase coverage through a health insurance exchange are eligible for a premium tax credit cost sharing subsidy to reduce the cost of coverage. individuals eligible for public coverage are not eligible for premium assistance in Exchanges. In states without expanded Medicaid coverage, individuals with incomes less than 100% of poverty will not be eligible for Exchange subsidies, while those with incomes at or above poverty will be.

Would an individual be eligible for premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies in the Exchange if he or she is offered "minimum essential coverage" by his or her employer in that it is both affordable and provides minimum value, but declines it and obtains coverage in the Exchange?


No. As a general rule, if an eligible employer-sponsored plan constitutes "minimum essential coverage" in that it is both affordable and provides minimum value merely being eligible for the plan will make an individual ineligible for the tax credit. In  Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-2(c)(3)(iii)(A), the IRS indicates that an eligible employee who declines enrollment in such a plan remains ineligible for the tax credit for each month in the coverage period related to the enrollment period (e.g., for the full plan year in the case of an annual enrollment period).

Would an individual be eligible for premium tax credits and cost sharing subsidies in the Exchange if he or she is enrolled coverage offered by his or employer that is either unaffordable and does not provides minimum value?


If an employee actually enrolls in an eligible employer-sponsored plan, the tax credit is not available-even if the plan does not meet the affordability and minimum value conditions, as provided in Code Section 36B(c)(2)(C)(iii). Employees who are automatically enrolled in an eligible employer-sponsored plan have a grace period to unwind the enrollment to maintain their eligibility for the tax credit, as provided in Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-2(c)(3)(vii)(B). An employee is not considered eligible for minimum essential coverage (i.e., may qualify for the tax credit) during any required waiting period before coverage becomes effective under an eligible employer-sponsored plan. The IRS is expected to provide a safe harbor under which an employer would not have to pay the shared responsibility tax penalty under Code § 4980H for failing to offer coverage for at least the first three months after an employee's hire date, as provided in Department of Labor Technical Release 2012-01, Q/A-3.

Individuals who meet these thresholds for unaffordable employer-sponsored insurance are eligible to enroll in a health insurance exchange and may receive tax credits to reduce the cost of coverage purchased through the exchange.

What are the amounts of the premium tax credit and cost- sharing subsidies to be provided?


Under Code Section 36B(b), the amount of the tax credit that a person can receive is based on the premium for the second lowest cost silver plan in the Exchange . A silver plan is a plan that provides the essential benefits and has an actuarial value of 70%. (A 70% actuarial value means that on average the plan pays 70% of the cost of covered benefits for a standard population of enrollees.)

Under Code Section 36B(b)(3), the amount of the tax credit varies with income such that the premium that the premium a person would have to pay for the second lowest cost silver plan would not exceed a specified percentage of their income (adjusted for family size), as follows:


Household Income (as percentage of  Federal Poverty Line (FPL) Premium as a Percent of Household Income

Up to133%           2%  of income
133-150%             3-4% of income
150-200%             4-6.3% of income
200-250%             6.3-8.05%  of income
250-300%             8.05-9.5% of income
300-400%             9.5% of income
 
In addition, Section 1402(b) of PPACA limits the total amount that people must pay out-of-pocket for cost sharing for essential benefits. Generally, the limits are based on the maximum out-of-pocket limits for Health Savings Account-qualified health plans ($6,250 for single coverage and $12,500 for family coverage in 2013), which will be indexed to the change in the Consumer Price Index until 2014 when the provision takes effect.

After 2014, the limits will be indexed to the change in the cost of health Coverage. Individuals with incomes at or below 400% of federal poverty line have their out-of-pocket liability capped at lower levels, as follows:
Household Income (as percentage of Federal Poverty Line (FPL) 

Reduction in Out-of-Pocket Liability
100-200%             Two-thirds of the maximum
200-300%             One-half of the maximum
300-400%             One-third of the maximum
 
The limits on out-of-pocket maximum amounts means that a person with income of 150% of poverty purchasing coverage in the exchange would have the limit on their out-of-pocket spending reduced to at least two-thirds of the generally applicable maximum value (for example, if the provision were in effect in 2013, the out-of-pocket maximum for single coverage for such a person would be about $2,083 for single coverage and $4,166 for family coverage).

In addition, Section 1402(c) of PPACA provides that federal payments will be made to health insurers to increase the actuarial value of the plan for individuals with household incomes under 250% of the federal poverty line. For example, for individuals with household incomes between 100% and 150% of federal poverty line, the actuarial value of the plan will be increased to 94%. That means that in addition to keeping within the lower out of pocket maximums established above, insurers must make other changes to increase the actuarial value of the coverage. Most likely this will mean reducing plan deductibles, coinsurance or copayments in order to meet the higher actuarial value requirements.

For individuals with household incomes over 250% of federal poverty line, the actuarial value of their plan may not exceed 70%, which is the basic value of the silver plan even for those who receive no financial assistance. This means that, for some individuals, some cost sharing amounts could increase. That would happen if their out of pocket maximum was decreased to keep within the required lower maximum, because the deductibles, copayments or coinsurance that would otherwise apply would have to be increased to keep the actuarial value at 70%.

The last cost sharing subsidy is summarized below:

Household Income (as percentage of Federal Poverty Line (FPL) Net Value of the Subsidy (% of Actuarial Value)
Out-of-Pocket Liability
100-150%                            94%
150-200%                         87%
200-250%                         73%
250-400%                         70%

Who determines an individual's eligibility for the premium tax credit and the cost-sharing subsidies?


Under 45 CFR Section 155.300, HHS is requiring the Exchanges to establish a system of coordinated eligibility and enrollment so that an individual can simultaneously apply for enrollment in a Qualified Health Plan ("QHP"), as well as Insurance Affordability Programs ("IAPs"), including the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reductions. Under Treasury Proposed Regulation Section 301.6103(l)(21). The IRS is permitted to disclose income and other specified information about an individual taxpayer to HHS for purposes of making eligibility determinations for advance payments of the premium tax credit or the cost-sharing reductions.

When an individual purchases a Qualified Health Plan how are any credits and subsidies applied?


Under the Actuarial Value and Cost-Sharing Reductions Bulletin (released by HHS), when an individual receives covered essential health benefits, the provider would collect from the individual only the amount of cost-sharing specified in the silver plan variation in which the individual is enrolled. The federal government would pay in advance to the insurer amounts estimated to cover the cost-sharing reductions associated with the specific silver plan variation. HHS intends to propose that this advance cost-sharing reduction payment to the insurer would occur monthly, and that after the end of the calendar year, the federal government would reconcile the advance payments to actual cost-sharing reduction amounts. 

The Exchange must report to the IRS and to each taxpayer required information for the Qualified Health Plan in which the employee (or a member of the employee's family) is enrolled through the Exchange, as provided in Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-4. In turn, individuals who receive advance payments of the premium tax credit must file an income tax return for that taxable year, as provided in Treasury Regulation Section 1.36B-5.

For More Information:

If you have any comments or questions regarding any of above information, please do not hesitate to call (708) 717-9638 or e-mail at  larry[at]larrygrudzien[dot]com

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Look to the state of Washington to see what a health insurance death spiral looks like.


Here's an older article talking about what happened in the state of Washington. Focus on the pre-ex clause. Even with an individual mandate (which doesn't impact 47% of the population and the rest will be a very minor penalty). If we don't impose a pre-existing condition clause on a person who chooses NOT to take coverage during an "open enrollment period" then we will have the same issues as Washington did. It's not the individual mandate, it's also the pre-ex that can kill insurance.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/03/30/want-to-see-a-health-insurance-death-spiral-visit-washington-state/

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Family Health Premiums reach $15,745 this year and how much you'll need to pay in 2014

I was reading USA Today this morning and an article listed two surveys stating that the average cost of coverage for a family is $15,745/year (http://usat.ly/PiBDpC) with employees paying $4,300/year of that cost. This translates into a 4% increase from last year, but with salary increases flat, the average family just lost buying power.

That said, let's see how the Affordable Care Act will impact the employee's portion of the cost of insurance in 2014. Here are the actual percent payouts based upon family income:

  • 150% - 200% of Federal Poverty Level (FPL) equals people paying up to 6.3% of their income on health insurance. 
  • 201% - 250% of FPL equals 8.05% of their income on health insurance. 
  • 250% - 400% FPL equals 9.5% of their income on health insurance.

Let's see how this stacks up with the $4,300/year the average family pays towards their health insurance (assuming a family of 4).
In 2012, the FPL is $23,050 for a family of four.
150% of FPL = $34,575/year of income with a maximum spent on health insurance being $2,178.23.
200% of FPL = $46,100/year of income with a maximum spent on health insurance being $3,711.05.
250% of FPL = $57,625/year of income with a maximum spent on health insurance being $5,474.38.

What this means, especially in the Chicagoland area, is that you won't notice a change in your premium when health reform occurs. What health reform gives you is an opportunity of purchasing your own coverage and NOT being depended upon your employer. It will be interesting to see how many employees leave to start their own businesses or become consultants.

[Removed]

Again, the Affordable Care Act is not what it is hyped to be. There will be no "free healthcare" for the majority of Americans. Most likely, they will be paying the same or a little bit more for their coverage than what they are paying now. The best part of health reform is that anyone can obtain a plan (guaranteed issue), with no pre-existing conditions (everything is covered from day one - as long as the insurance plan covers the conditions), and a person cannot be charged an extra premium other than if they are a smoker (community rating).