Good stuff from BCBS of IL on when an individual can enroll in a health insurance plan.
May 29, 2013
Legislative Update
Affordable Care Act Question of the Week: Exchange Open Enrollment [All Markets]
We have received a number of questions about the initial open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Beginning Jan. 1, 2014, most U.S. citizens and legal residents will be required to have a minimum level of health care coverage. If you have a general question about an ACA provision, contact your account representative.
Q: If an uninsured does not enroll through a health insurance exchange (also known as a health insurance marketplace) during the open enrollment period for coverage effective Jan. 1, 2014, under what circumstances may an individual enroll and receive coverage during 2014?
A: The initial open enrollment period for the exchange begins Oct. 1, 2013, and extends through March 31, 2014.
If an individual does not enroll during the initial open enrollment period or future enrollment periods (for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2015, the annual open enrollment period begins Oct. 15 and extends through Dec. 7 of the preceding calendar year), they can enroll if circumstances triggered one of the following events:
A qualified individual and any dependents losing other minimum essential coverage.
A qualified individual gaining or becoming a dependent through marriage, birth, adoption or placement for adoption.
An individual, not previously lawfully present, gaining status as a citizen, national or lawfully present individual in the United States.
A qualified individual experiencing an error in enrollment.
An individual enrolled in a Qualified Health Plan (QHP) adequately demonstrating to the exchange that the QHP in which he or she is enrolled substantially violated a material provision of its contract.
An individual becoming newly eligible or newly ineligible for advance payments of the premium tax credit or experiencing a change in eligibility for cost-sharing reductions.
New QHPs offered through the exchange becoming available to a qualified individual or enrollee as a result of a permanent move.
The individual is an Indian, as defined by the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. (We solicited comment on the potential implications on the process for verifying Indian status for purposes of this special enrollment period.)
A qualified individual or enrollee meeting other exceptional circumstances, as determined by the Exchange or Health & Human Services (HHS). Loss of coverage does not include failure to pay premiums on a timely basis, including COBRA premiums prior to expiration of COBRA coverage.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, an individual or enrollee has 60 days from the date of a triggering event to select a plan. Note: This 60-day Special Enrollment Period (SEP) window applies to the individual market. Group market is 30 days for the SEP window.
Friday, May 31, 2013
Affordable Care Act Open Enrollment FAQ for the Individual Market
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Latest News on the Affordable Care Act
I've compiled a series of interesting articles this week about different aspects of the Affordable Care Act.
First, this piece on the Federal Pre-Existing Condition
Insurance Plan’s solvency (or lack thereof). The Federal Government totally
under estimated the claims of those people who went on it.
Second is a study of the current cost of health insurance.
Please look at the dollars that are currently being spent and tell me whether
this is sustainable.
Third is Chicago Politics as its best. What do politicians
do once they are elected? They hire all of their supporters of course. It looks
like if you’d like a job as an assister, go talk to HHS.
Oops, the Government forgot that some people don’t have bank
accounts with which to pay for their premiums.
Here’s something that came to my attention last week. This
is in California, but may apply to other states. Doctors may be stuck with
paying for patients’ care due to non-payment of health insurance premiums.
Unions are figuring out that they are being treated like
everyone else in regards to Health Reform. Businesses don’t get special
treatment, but Unions believe they should.
Here’s an interesting study on the impact of increasing
premiums and young adults purchasing insurance. Note that this is from an organization that doesn't like the ACA.
Labels:
aca,
affordable care act,
employer mandate,
federal exchange,
health care reform,
health exchange,
health reform,
individual mandate,
nahu,
obama care,
obamacare,
pcip,
penalties,
ppaca,
premium tax credits
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Small Group and the Affordable Care Act - Do I really need to comply? NO!!!
You know how things kind of ruminate in the back of your mind for awhile before you "suddenly" have a realization? That's what happened to me a last week.
If your company is less than 50 employees (combining Full Time and Full Time Equivalents), then you are considered a "Small Group" under the definition set out by the Affordable Care Act. While everyone is talking about 30 hours this, Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum medal plans that, penalties for not offering minimum coverage and cost, etc. The reality is that you will not be subjected to the employer mandate and therefore will not face any penalties if you do not comply with that mandate such as not offering coverage, not making it "affordable", or not offering compliant coverage (Note that there are other items which you must comply with such as providing a Summary of Benefits of Coverage to each employee).
To be straight, I'm not talking about plan designs or things outside of your control. I'm talking about changing the amount you contribute to your employee's premium, number of hours they are required to work before they are considered full time, etc.
You don't have to offer a plan that meets one of the Medal plans even though the probability of a plan being available that doesn't meet the guidelines is close to zero. You don't have to offer coverage to dependents (BTW, spouses are, by ACA definition, NOT dependents). Of course you may not be able to
You don't have to make sure that the employee only pays no more than 9.5% of their income towards employee only coverage on your lowest compliant plan to meet "Safe Harbor." As a matter of fact, it's probably NOT in your best interest to do this. You may harm your employees unknowingly. For example, if you do offer a "Bronze" level plan and meet the "Safe Harbor" of the above for the employee and offer coverage to their dependents, then your employee is NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A SUBSIDY. If you have lower income employees, this could be bad as a plan within the individual/family exchange may be less expensive and cover more than the plan you offer. For higher income employees who are close to or over the 400% Federal Poverty Level for income, this doesn't impact them much.
What does this mean? It means you have more flexibility that you know. If you have 5 or more employees (for Illinois at least - every state is different, in New York, only employers with over 50 employees are allowed to look at the following plans), and your workforce is younger and healthy, then you may want to explore a "level funded benefit" plan. This is partially self-funding. In the eyes of the government, it is considered self funded and not subject to some of the restrictions of the ACA. In the eyes of your employees, it looks and works exactly like a fully insured plan except with the possibility of receiving money back after your plan year if claims were less than expected.
Also, if your agent hasn't mentioned that you can do an early renewal (this means renewing this year, then renewing again on 12/1/2013) to push off the reforms (including changes in plan designs) until the end of 2014, call and ask them about it.
In general, work with your agent, roll up your sleeves and see what works best for your business first, then employees (understanding that without happy employees, your business will go down the drain).
If your company is less than 50 employees (combining Full Time and Full Time Equivalents), then you are considered a "Small Group" under the definition set out by the Affordable Care Act. While everyone is talking about 30 hours this, Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum medal plans that, penalties for not offering minimum coverage and cost, etc. The reality is that you will not be subjected to the employer mandate and therefore will not face any penalties if you do not comply with that mandate such as not offering coverage, not making it "affordable", or not offering compliant coverage (Note that there are other items which you must comply with such as providing a Summary of Benefits of Coverage to each employee).
To be straight, I'm not talking about plan designs or things outside of your control. I'm talking about changing the amount you contribute to your employee's premium, number of hours they are required to work before they are considered full time, etc.
You don't have to offer a plan that meets one of the Medal plans even though the probability of a plan being available that doesn't meet the guidelines is close to zero. You don't have to offer coverage to dependents (BTW, spouses are, by ACA definition, NOT dependents). Of course you may not be able to
You don't have to make sure that the employee only pays no more than 9.5% of their income towards employee only coverage on your lowest compliant plan to meet "Safe Harbor." As a matter of fact, it's probably NOT in your best interest to do this. You may harm your employees unknowingly. For example, if you do offer a "Bronze" level plan and meet the "Safe Harbor" of the above for the employee and offer coverage to their dependents, then your employee is NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A SUBSIDY. If you have lower income employees, this could be bad as a plan within the individual/family exchange may be less expensive and cover more than the plan you offer. For higher income employees who are close to or over the 400% Federal Poverty Level for income, this doesn't impact them much.
What does this mean? It means you have more flexibility that you know. If you have 5 or more employees (for Illinois at least - every state is different, in New York, only employers with over 50 employees are allowed to look at the following plans), and your workforce is younger and healthy, then you may want to explore a "level funded benefit" plan. This is partially self-funding. In the eyes of the government, it is considered self funded and not subject to some of the restrictions of the ACA. In the eyes of your employees, it looks and works exactly like a fully insured plan except with the possibility of receiving money back after your plan year if claims were less than expected.
Also, if your agent hasn't mentioned that you can do an early renewal (this means renewing this year, then renewing again on 12/1/2013) to push off the reforms (including changes in plan designs) until the end of 2014, call and ask them about it.
In general, work with your agent, roll up your sleeves and see what works best for your business first, then employees (understanding that without happy employees, your business will go down the drain).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)